In changed circumstances, the petitioner withdrew his bail application pursuant to clause D of paragraph 5. The court permitted the withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGBAD.
Office notes, office Memoranda of | coram, appearance, court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders |
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.150/2011
Bashiroddin Nasiroddin Siddiqui VS The State of Maha.
....
ShriJoydeepChatterji,Adv.for
petr.
Shri V.H.Dighe,A.P.P. for R-State
....
CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL,J.
DATE : 25/01/2011.
1]Heard Shri Chatterji.
2]In changed circumstances as
disclosed in Clause �D� of para 5,
bail is sought. Counsel on
instructionswithdrawsthe
application. Permitted.
umg/criapln150-11
Bashiroddin Nasiroddin Siddiqui
The State of Maharashtra
K.U.CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court