Disposed
Sayed Ghulam Abbas Kazmi v. H.H.J Shri M.L. Tahiliyani and Anr.
Bombay HCAPPCP/1/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRI. APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2011 IN CRI. CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 10 OF 2010
Syed Ghulam Abbas Kazmi
.. Applicant
Vs
H.H.J. Shri. M.L. Tahiliyani & Anr .. Respondents
Mr. Rafiq Dada, Sr. Counsel i/b Mr. R.M. Momin for the Applicant Mr. P.A. Pol, PP for the State
CORAM : P.V. HARDAS & M.N. GILANI, JJ.
DATE : 25th MARCH, 2011.
PER COURT:
1. By this application, the applicant / petitioner seeks to amend the petition as per the proposed amendment disclosed in the application. We have heard Shri. Rafiq Dada, the learned senior counsel for the applicant and learned Public Prosecutor on behalf of respondent no. 2 and for the reasons disclosed in the application, the application is allowed and the applicant is permitted to amend the petition as per the proposed amendment disclosed in the application. Amendment be carried out within two weeks from today.
[ M.N. GILANI, J ] [ P.V. HARDAS, J ]
1
2
Syed Ghulam Abbas Kazmi
H.H.J. Shri. M.L. Tahiliyani & Anr.
P.V. Hardas
M.N. Gilani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court