Dismissing the criminal application as not pressed on merits by the applicant. The court expedited the listing of the underlying appeal for 'Convicts in Jail' as per assignment guidelines.
The application was dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PPD
1
4.appa-30-11.apeal-908-04
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.30 OF 2011 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.908 OF 2004
Imtiyaj Noorahamad Hundekari. ..Applicant.
Vs.
State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent.
Ms.P.U. Badadere, Advocate h/f. Mr.P.R. Arjunwadkar, Advocate for Applicant.
Mr.D.P. Adsule, A.P.P. for the State.
CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 21st JANUARY, 2011.
P.C.
the earlier bail Application filed by the Applicant, the Applicant will not press this Application on merits. She further submits that the Applicant would be more than content if the Appeal is taken up for hearing. Accordingly this application is dismissed as not pressed.
2
4.appa-30-11.apeal-908-04
Appeals covered by the category of "Convicts in Jail' are already treated as expedited category cases. In the circumstances, the Office shall take steps to list the Applicant’s Appeal as per its turn under the category :
“Convicts in Jail”.
(A. R. JOSHI, J.)
(A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.)
Imtiyaj Noorahamad Hundekari
State of Maharashtra
A.M. KHANWILKAR
A.R. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
