The High Court of Bombay disposed of the appeal by consent of parties. The impugned order was set aside and deposits were invested in fixed deposit during the pendency of the suit.
Impugned order set aside; Rs.8,50,000 investment in fixed deposit; restriction on third party rights during suit pendency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
app570.11.sxw
1
ssm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO. 570 OF 2011 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.........../2011 IN SUIT (LODGING) NO. 1697 OF 2011
Rajdeep Construction Pvt. Ltd. ....Appellant.
(Orig. Defendant)
Vs.
Solar Readymade Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
...Respondents.
(Orig. Plaintiffs)
And
Yes Bank Limited
...Respondent.
Mr. M.L. Palan with Ms. Devyani Wanjara i/by M/s. B.R. Oza & Co. for the Appellants.
Mr. Jay Savla with Mr. P. Majumdar i/by M/s. M.P. Savla & Co. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
Ms. Sudeshna Roy i/by M/s. Vidhi & Partners for Respondent No.3.
CORAM :- D.K DESHMUKH AND ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.
DATE :- 17 NOVEMBER, 2011.
P.C. :-
Admit. Heard finally.
2 app570.11.sxw
ssm
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
Rajdeep Construction Pvt. Ltd.
Solar Readymade Pvt. Ltd.
Yes Bank Limited
D.K. DESHMUKH
ANOOP V. MOHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
