The High Court allowed the withdrawal of a criminal application. The applicant submitted that the respondent had paid the demanded amount, leaving no controversy to resolve.
The criminal application was disposed of allowing the withdrawal of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
hvn
910//apl//259.11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 259 OF 2011
Narayandas Hiralal ... Applicant
Versus
Yedur Yarns and anr. ... Respondents
Mr. Priyal Sarda, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. Anand S. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2.
Mrs.M.M. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for State.
CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL,J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 20, 2011
P.C.
Heard.
On instructions, the learned counsel for the applicant submits that
the demand draft of Rs. 40,000/- paid by respondent Yedur Yarns is received by the complainant. Consequently, nothing survives. Petition allowed to be withdrawn. Disposed of.
(K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)
1
Narayandas Hiralal
Yedur Yarns
K.U. CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
