High Court at Criminal Appeal Application No. 203 of 2011. Applicant sought cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to husband, father-in-law, and mother-in-law in Sections 498A, 406, 504, 516 IPC case. Applicant and counsel were absent; prosecution opposed cancellation. Court rejected application for cancellation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APL-203-11.sxw
1
Dixit
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.203 OF 2011
| Neha Varun Gupta V/s. |
... | Applicant |
|---|---|---|
| State of Maharashtra, | ||
| Thru’ Trombay Police Station & Ors. | ... | Respondents |
None for the Applicant. Mr. K.V. Saste, APP, for Respondent No.1. Mr. Prashant Badole for Respondent Nos.2 to 4.
CORAM:- A.M. THIPSAY, J.
DATED :- 23RD JUNE, 2011.
P.C. :
APL-203-11.sxw
2
Dixit
[ A.M. THIPSAY, J.]
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the husband, father-in-law, and mother-in-law should be allowed in the absence of the applicant and lack of prosecutorial instr
Whether sufficient grounds exist to cancel anticipatory bail when the applicant and her advocate are absent.
Whether the investigation being over and charge framing negates the necessity for detention of the accused.
Neha Varun Gupta
State of Maharashtra
A.M. Thipsay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
