On appeal challenging a Magistrate's sentence of fine, this court upheld the conviction and dismissed the appeal holding the fine appropriately proportionate to the offence of voluntarily causing hurt.
The appeal filed by the State is dismissed; the sentence of fine is upheld.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
apeal 205 of 2011
1
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.205 OF 2011
The State of Maharashtra .. Appellant. -versus Surjeetsingh Munshasingh Miniya and anr .. Respondents.
Mrs P.P. Bhosale, APP for the Appellant State.
CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 9th June, 2011
P.C.
(R. C. CHAVAN, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned sentence of fine should be enhanced by the Appellate Court.
Whether the sentence of imprisonment was warranted for the offences of voluntarily causing hurt and voluntarily causing hurt on extremestraint.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
The State of Maharashtra
Surjeetsingh Munshasingh Miniya
anr
R.C. CHAVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
