This is an appeal against an order in a possession dispute between two brothers. The High Court held that the interim order was correct and dismissed the appeals, also dismissing related civil applications.
Appeals from orders are dismissed. Civil applications do not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(33)AO.419.11-AO.478.11.sxw
1
mnm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 419 OF 2011 WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.478 OF 2011
Manoj Chaurasia Vs.
Ramesh Lakhulal Chaurasia
...Appellant (Orig.Defdt.)
...Respondent (Orig.Pltff.)
Ms. Ankita Singhania a/w. Ms. Mrunalini Panchal, Advocates i/b. M/s. Halai & Co., for the Appellant Mr. Anil C. Singh a/w. Mr. Anil D. Yadav, i/b. Mr. D.R. Shah, Advocates for the Respondent
CORAM : SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED : 16TH AUGUST, 2011
P.C. :
(33)AO.419.11-AO.478.11.sxw
2
paid. The aspect of payment of Court fees can be considered in the suit.
(SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal from order in suits for recovery of possession between two brothers should be allowed.
Whether the interim order regarding possession requires interference.
Manoj Chaurasia
Ramesh Lakhulal Chaurasia
Roshan Dalvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
