Meenakshi Prabhakar Patil v. Pravin Madhukar Thakur
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant sought to challenge the respondent's election alleging non-disclosure of asset information. The respondent applied for dismissal under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The court dismissed the application, holding that conflicting judgments on the mandatory nature of asset disclosure must still be considered.
What did the court decide?
Application for summary dismissal and striking out of petition paragraphs dismissed.
What the court decided
- 1 -
22.aep.7.2011 ep.21.09
skt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPLICATION IN ELECTION PETITION NO.7 OF 2011
IN
ELECTION PETITION NO.21 OF 2009
Meenakshi Prabhakar Patil ..Applicant/Petitioner -Versus- Pravin Madhukar Thakur ..Respondent
Mr.B.D.Joshi a/w. Mr.C.G.Gavnekar i/b G.S.Hiranandani for the Applicant/Orig. Respondent.
Mr.Pramod N. Patil with Mr.Laxman Deshmukh for the Respondent/Original Petitioner in the application.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 10TH AUGUST 2011.
P.C.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Election Petition should be struck out under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for non-disclosure of cause of action.
Whether the Supreme Court's stay on a conflicting judgment precludes its consideration in this pending election petition.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Meenakshi Prabhakar Patil
- respondent
Pravin Madhukar Thakur
Coram
S.J. VAZIFDAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court