Dismissed
North End Oil Ltd. v. M.v."Kim an"
Bombay HCADMS/93/1998
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ADMIRALTY &…
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
¶1
ADMS93-98
¶2
1
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ADMIRALTY & VICE ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION
¶4
ADMIRALTY SUIT NO.93 OF 1998
¶5
North End Oil Ltd
¶6
.. Plaintiff
¶7
Versus
¶8
m.v. “KIM AN” .. Defendant
¶9
Bimal Rajeshekhar for the applicant. Ms Sophia Mhasvedkar for the plaintiff
¶10
CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.
¶11
DATE : 6th January 2011.
¶12
P.C.:
¶13
1] It is stated that the claim in the suit is settled and, therefore, the plaintiff's Advocate has received instructions from the plaintiff to apply for withdrawal of the suit.
Coram
AI extract
S.C.DHARMADHIKARI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Sumac Security Services Vs the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
Godrej Agrovet Limited Vs ----------------------------------------------------
Union of India Vs R.Y. Shukla and Ors. and Smt. Sahajadi Mohamed Turab Khan Pathan
Bombay Seeds Extractions Export Marketing Agencies Pvt. Ltd. Vs ------------------------------------------