The plaintiff's suit was allowed to be withdrawn with an order for refund of court fees as per rules.
Suit allowed to be withdrawn with refund of court fees as per rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
901.s.1287.11
skt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 1287 OF 2011
WITH LEAVE PETITION NO. 120 OF 2011 IN SUIT (L) NO. 360 OF 2011
Divyang D. Parekh & Anr. ..Plaintiffs
-Versus-
Tenova Spa & Ors.
..Defendants
Ms.Snehal Shroff i/b Ans Law Associates for the Plaintiffs.
None for the Defendants.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 21ST JUNE 2011.
P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Divyang D. Parekh & Anr.
Tenova Spa & Ors.
S.J. VAZIFDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
