This is a brief order dismissing a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of an FIR. The court held the petition inadmissible because the petitioner was not named as an accused in the crime.
Petition dismissed as it could not be entertained since the petitioner is not an accused.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.883 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's orders. Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Mr.M.P.Mishra for the petitioner. Mrs.S.D.Shinde APP for the State.
CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE & A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 9/04/2010
PC:
(A.R.JOSHI,J.) (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR can be entertained where the petitioner is not shown as an accused.
Petitioner
State
D.B. BHOSALE
A.R. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
