The High Court summarily dismissed a writ petition filed by the State, holding that no orders prejudicial to the State's interest were passed by the learned Tribunal, rendering the petition wholly without substance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 6948 OF 2010 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER vs. GOVIND DAMODHARRAO MULE
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram or directions and Registrar's orders. appearances, Court's Orders
1
Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for the petitioner
CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE :- 13th December, 2010.
PER COURT :-
1] No orders prejudicial to the interest of the petitioner State is passed by the learned Tribunal. The petition is, therefore, wholly without substance and as such liable to be dismissed. Writ petition stands summarily dismissed.
[R.M. BORDE, J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.]
grt/-
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 6948 OF 2010 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER vs. GOVIND DAMODHARRAO MULE
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram or directions and Registrar's orders. appearances, Court's Orders
2
The State of Maharashtra and Another
Govind Damodharrao Mule
B.R. Gavai
R.M. Borde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
