Petitioners sought leave to withdraw a writ petition due to the existence of an equally efficacious alternative remedy, enabling them to pursue available legal remedies under the law.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
１
srk
wp-654-10
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 654 OF 2010
Usman Habib Dhuka and others. ... Petitioners Versus Mashayak Grihnirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit and nothers. ... Respondents
Mr.K.D. Jha for the petitioners.
Ms. Swadha Srivastav i/by Mr. Srivastav for respondent No.2. Mr. P.G. Lad, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.4-State.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
Tuesday, August 3, 2010
P .C.
Since the petitioners have equally efficacious alternative remedy, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw this petition so as to enable the petitioners to take all such available remedies under the law. 2. Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
CHIEF JUSTICE
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
Usman Habib Dhuka
Mashayak Grihnirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit
Mohit S. Shah
S.C. Dharmadhikari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
