Dismissed
Sudam Babu Shirsat v. Thethe State of Mahrashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/599/2010
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Criminal writ petition dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 599 OF 2010
Sudam s/o Babu Shirsat
..PETITIONER
VERSUS
State of Mah. & ors.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr N.L. Jadhav, Advocate for the petitioner; Mr B.V. Wagh, A.P.P. for respondents no.1 to 4.
CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND A.V. POTDAR, JJ.
DATE : 26th August, 2010
PER COURT :
Shri N.L. Jadhav, learned Counsel for the petitioner states on instructions from the petitioner that in the light of the affidavit in reply filed on behalf of the respondents, the learned Counsel for the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition. This writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
( A.V. POTDAR, J.) ( P.V.HARDAS, J. )
amj/criwp599.10
Sudam s/o Babu Shirsat
State of Mah.
P.V. Hardas
A.V. Potdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court