Petition permitted to be withdrawn. It is dismissed as withdrawn pursuant to the statement by the AGP regarding time-bound decisions under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
W.P.No. 5704/2010
Gulab Ramkrishna Jivtode and another .vs. State of Maharashtra and another.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders.
Mr. K.R.Lambat, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. S.S.Wandile, AGP for R-1 and 2.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA & A.B.CHAUDHARI,JJ DATE : 15.12.2010
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned AGP for respondents.
Learned AGP makes a statement that, if any First Appeal is pending, then the application under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act would be decided within ten weeks, if not already decided.
In view of the statement made by the learned A.G.P., the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition. The petition is permitted to be withdrawn. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.`
JUDGE JUDGE
patle
2`
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gulab Ramkrishna Jivtode and another
State of Maharashtra and another
V.C. Daga
A.B. Chaudhari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
