Sandhya Rajesh Patil v. the State of Mah
Case brief
What is this about?
The criminal writ petition was disposed of as infructuous upon the instruction of counsel for the petitioner.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed of as infructuous. No costs.
What the court decided
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.566 OF 2010
________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
________________________________________________________ The learned Counsel Mr. Bipin Patil instructed by learned Counsel Mr. Hemant Surve appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, makes a statement that the writ petition has become infructuous. The statement is accepted and taken on record. We heard the learned A.P.P. Mr. Shaikh for the respondent State. 2 Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. No costs.
(S.S. SHINDE, J) (S.B. DESHMUKH,J) 29.07.2010. kadam/*
Coram
S.S. SHINDE
S.B. DESHMUKH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court