The petitioner requested withdrawal of a criminal writ petition and promised a fresh representation regarding investigation transfer. The High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad dismissed the petition as withdrawn based on counsel's statement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.501 OF 2010
Sow.Mubinabee w/o Khaja Moinoddin Pathan
..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and ors.
..Respondents
Mr.V.D.Gunale, Advocate holding for Mr.S.G.Rudrawar, Advocate for petitioner
Mr.N.R.Shaikh, A.P.P. for respondents 1 to 4 Mr.Sadat A.Quazi, Advocate for respondent No.5
CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND
A.V.POTDAR, JJ.
DATE : 24th August 2010
PER COURT :
( A.V.POTDAR, J.)
( P.V.HARDAS, J.)
(vvr/501.10criwp)
2
Sow.Mubinabee w/o Khaja Moinoddin Pathan
The State of Maharashtra
P.V.HARDAS
A.V.POTDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
