Dismissed

Chandrakant Purushottam Gadge v. Nagpur Municipal Corporation Thr. Its Commissioner and Anr.

Bombay HC23 Dec 2010WP/4930/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the writ petition avoiding further consideration of the Patwardhan ground due to pending public interest litigations, directing the respondent to consider other grounds on merits.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed. Nagpur Municipal Corporation directed to consider other grounds on merits within a reasonable time.

Chandrakant Purushottam Gadge Vs Nagpur Municipal… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2010)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 4930 /2010 (Chandrakant Purshottam Gadge vs. Nagpur Municipal Corporation and others )

¶4

......................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of

¶5

Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders

¶6

Mr D V Dhondarkar, Adv.for petitioner

¶7

CORAM : V.C. DAGA &

¶8

A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ .

¶9

DATED : 23rd December, 2010.

¶10

In view of the spate of public interest litigations pending in respect of the Patwardhan ground, we do not propose to entertain this petition. Petition is dismissed.

¶11

However, the Nagpur Municipal Corporation may consider any other ground that can be made available to the petitioner, on its own merits, within a reasonable time.

¶12

JUDGEJUDGE

¶13

sahare

Chandrakant Purushottam Gadge v. Nagpur Municipal Corporation Thr. Its Commissioner and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandrakant Purushottam Gadge v. Nagpur Municipal Corporation Thr. Its Commissioner and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs. Kirti Atul Nipankar Vs Principle Secty., Min. of Health and 3 Ors.

Y. Radhakrishnan Gajendra Rao Vs State of Mah. Thr. Its Secty., and 4 Ors.

M/S Vijaya and Company Thr Prop. Rajura Vs State of Maha. Thr Secretary, Revenue and Forest Dept. Mumbai and Others

Umesh S/O Dayashankar Coubey and Anr. Vs State of Mah. Thr. Its Secy. Freedom Fighter Deptt and 2 Oths

M/S New Anupam Bakery Prop. Ramesh L Khilwani Vs Sadhana Sahakari Bank Ltd. Thr. Auth. Officer and 2 Ors.

Jyoti Shikshan Prasara, Mandal,Kapil Vastu Nagar,Gorakshan Rd. Akola,Distt. Akola Thr., Secy. Vs National Council for Teachers Educn. HANSBHAWAN,1-BAHADURSHAHA,JAFAR Marg,New Delhi Thr. Secretary.