The petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition after the respondent Wakf Board quashed the impugned order. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 449 OF 2010
Accord Estates Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner
Versus
The Maharashtra State Board of Wakfs & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. F. Dubhash i/by M/s. Solomon & Co. for the Petitioner
None for the Respondents.
CORAM: J.N. PATEL AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ . DATE: MARCH 17, 2010
P.C.:-
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that in view of the Wakf Board having quashed the impugned order by their order dated 11th March, 2010, the petitioner does not want to prosecute the petition, and be permitted to withdraw the same. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
record and marked ‘X’ for identification.
J.N. PATEL, J.
A.P. BHANGALE, J.
Accord Estates Pvt. Ltd.
The Maharashtra State Board of Wakfs
J.N. PATEL
A.P. BHANGALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
