Petitioners withdrew the Writ Petition with liberty to adopt appropriate remedies. The Court dismissed the Writ Petition as withdrawn and held that the associated Civil Applications, which do not survive, are dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4244 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2006 OF 2010 & CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2341 OF 2010
Kavita S. Motiramani & Anr.....Petitioners
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.....Respondents
Mr. G.K. Khare, Advocate for Petitioners.
Mr. S.R. Nargolkar, AGP for respondents no.1,2,4 & 6.
Mr. S.M. Kamble, Advocate for respondent no.3.
Mr. P.D. Dalvi, Advocate for respondent No.5.
Coram : Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud & Smt.R.P. SondurBaldota, JJ. Date : September 7, 2010
P.C.
1. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to adopt appropriate remedies. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the request made before the Court.
2. In view of the disposal of the Writ Petition, the Civil Applications do not survive and are dismissed as infructuous.
(Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota,J.) (Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
Kavita S. Motiramani & Anr
State of Maharashtra & Ors
D.Y. Chandrachud
R.P. SondurBaldota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court