Petitioner withdrew the writ petition pending disposal of a substantive petition challenging a notice under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. The court permitted the withdrawal.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file a petition raising challenge to the notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP+.4077
mss
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO. 4077 OF 2010
MOHAN PANDURANG KALATE
.. PETITIONER
Vs.
STATE OF MAHRASHTRA & ORS. .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. A. V. Anturkar i/b S. S. Salunke for the petitioner Mr. S.P. Thorat for R-2
CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI &
R. V. MORE, JJ.
DATED : 7/9/2010
P.C.
Mr. Anturkar, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the
notice dated 4/9/2010 purported to have been issued under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 has been served on the petitioner. He states that the petitioner wishes to challenge the said notice. Hence the petitioner has instructed him to withdraw the present petition and file a substantive petition raising challenge to the said notice.
2
WP+.4077
mss
liberty to file a petition raising challenge to the notice dated 4/9/2010.
(R. V. MORE, J.)
2 provisions across 1 enactments
MOHAN PANDURANG KALATE
STATE OF MAHRASHTRA
RANJANA DESAI
R. V. MORE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
