Petitioner filed a criminal writ petition. Counsel submitted the petition was infructuous, and the court permitted its withdrawal without further orders on the merits.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp3352.10.sxw
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Criminal Writ Petition No. 3352 of 2010
Avinash Madan Aade ..Petitioner v/s. State of Maharashtra & ors. ..Respondents
Mr. J.G. Reddy for the petitioner. Mr. J.P. Yagnik – APP for the State.
CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR & A.P. BHANGALE, JJ
DATED :- DECEMBER 21, 2010.
P.C.
Counsel for the Petitioner submits that this Petition has become
infructuous. In the circumstances, Petition is allowed to be withdrawn.
(A.P.BHANGALE, J)
(A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)
Avinash Madan Aade
State of Maharashtra
A.M. Khanwilkar
A.P. Bhangale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
