Pradeep Pralhad Sardesai v. Govind Ramkisan Sarda
Case brief
What is this about?
This writ petition challenged the Trial Court's order permitting an additional affidavit in lieu of examination-in-chief to address documents produced during partial cross-examination. The High Court held there would be no prejudice to the petitioner and rejected the writ petition.
What did the court decide?
The Writ Petition was rejected and the impugned order allowing the additional affidavit was upheld.
What the court decided
1
Ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3156 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Shri Ashutosh M. Kulkarni for the Petitioner.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 26TH APRIL, 2010
P.C.:
. The Petitioner is the Defendant in a suit filed by
the Respondent. By the impugned order, the RespondentPlaintiff has been permitted to file an additional affidavit in lieu of examinationinchief. The Trial Court has observed that after in lieu of examination
inchief of the Respondent was filed and a part of this crossexamination was recorded, a witness produced certain documents on record. Permission has been granted to file additional affidavit in lieu of examination inchief for dealing with the said documents.
- The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner submitted that such a prayer could not have been
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Trial Court erred in granting permission to file an additional affidavit in lieu of examination-in-chief after the completion of cross-examination of the respondent.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Respondent-Plaintiff
Coram
A.S. Oka
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court