Bank of Maharashtra v. Harishchandra Gutt and Co. and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew writ petition no. 3117 of 2003; court allowed withdrawal and disposed of petition by leave granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3117 OF 2003
Bank Of Maharashtra.
... Petitioner.
vs.
Harishchandra Gutt & Co.
& Ors.
... Respondents.
Mr. Jayesh Desai i/by Singhi & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr. P.G. Pravin for Respondent No. 1 Mr. D.A. Nalawade, GP., for Respondent No. 3.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. &
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATE : 1st SEPTEMBER, 2010.
P.C.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition. Leave as sought for is granted. Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
(DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)
Bank Of Maharashtra
Harishchandra Gutt & Co.
Mohit S. Shah
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court