The court held that the issue in the writ petitions was no longer a legal question after a Supreme Court judgment and dismissed both petitions.
The writ petitions were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 293 OF 2009
WITH
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 294 OF 2009
Mr.Ravindra B. Shah & Anr....Petitioners
vs.
State of Maharashtra & Anr....Respondents
Mr.S.V. Marwadi i/b. Mr.S.P. Narkar for the
Petitioners.
Mrs.M.R. Tidake, APP for the State in Criminal Writ
Petition No.293/2009.
Mr.S.A. Shinde, APP for the State in Criminal Writ
Petition No. 294/2009.
Mr.Tushar Goradia and Ms.Nisha Parmar for Respondent
No.2.
CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J.
DATED : JULY 8, 2010
P.C. :-
1In view of the judgment of the Apex Court
in the case of Mandvi Co-op.Bank Ltd. vs. Nimesh B.
2
Thakore, reported in 2010 Law Suit (SC) 10, the
issue involved in both these petitions is no longer
res integra.
2Writ Petitions, accordingly, are dismissed.
(V.M. KANADE, J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mandvi Co-op.Bank Ltd. vs. Nimesh B. ThakoreApplied¶16
Mandvi Co-op.Bank Ltd. vs. Nimesh B. Thakore, reported in 2010 Law Suit (SC) 10
Ravindra B. Shah & Anr.
State of Maharashtra & Anr.
V.M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court