Petitioner sought withdrawal of Writ Petition No. 2779 of 2010 with liberty to challenge the impugned order in a potential appeal. The High Court of Bombay, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
mst
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2779 OF 2010
| Dinkar M. Kadam versus Mahadev Pandurang Kadam |
Petitioner and another Respondents |
|---|---|
| Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders |
Court’s or Judge’s orders |
| Umesh R. Mankapure for petitioner. | |
| CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 15thApril 2010 |
|
| PC :- | |
| 1. Advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to challenge the impugned order in the appeal which may be preferred against the decree which may be passed in the suit, if the same be adverse to him. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. All contentions of the parties are kept open. (A.S.OKA, J.) |
Dinkar M. Kadam
Mahadev Pandurang Kadam
A.S. OKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
