The High Court at Bombay dismissed Writ Petition No. 257 of 1998 for default, as neither the petitioner nor counsel appeared on the hearing date.
Petition dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SSK/
WP 257/98
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.257 OF 1998
AHIMSA & Anr. ....Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
...Respondents
None present for the Petitioners.
Mr. Rui A. Rodrigues with Mr.N. R. Prajapati, Advocate for Respt. No.8. Ms. M. Kajale, AGP for Union of India.
CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI & R. V. MORE, JJ.
DATED : 8th SEPTEMBER, 2010.
P.C.:
Neither the petitioner nor his counsel was present on 30th August, 2008. Hence, the petition was adjourned. Again on 1st September, 2010, neither the petitioner nor his counsel was present, and therefore, the matter was kept on today’s board under the caption “Dismissal”.
(R. V. MORE, J.)
(SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.)
Ahimsa & Anr.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Ranjana Desai
R. V. More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
