Disposed
Vithoba Biptuji Kathane v. State of Mah.and Another
Bombay HCWP/2433/1994
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO.2433 of 1994.
Vithoba Biptuji Kathane ..vs.. State of Mah. and anr.
=-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judges Order
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Mr.Kishor Lambat, Adv.for the petitioner. Smt.T.Khan AGP for resp.no.1 and 2.
C ORAM: V. C. DAGA AND A.B.CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATED : 19th November, 2010.
Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
The issue sought to be raised in this petition is covered by our Judgment delivered in W.P.No.4917 of 2003 (Chaitram Chindhuji Wasnik ..vs.. State of Mah. and ors.), decided on 28th December, 2006. For the reasons stated in the said judgment, rule is made absolute. No order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE.
pzc
2
Vithoba Biptuji Kathane
State of Mah.
anr.
V. C. Daga
A. B. Chaudhari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court