The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an MHADA allotment order dated September 16, 2009, as it was filed with undue delay in July 2010, rendering it barred for entertainment.
The writ petition challenging the allotment order is dismissed for being filed with undue delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
mst
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2272 OF 2010
M/s.Shiva Cable Vision versus State of Maharashtra and others
Petitioner
Respondents
Mr.Ditendra Mishra for petitioner. Mr.G.W.Mattos, AGP for respondents.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 20th December 2010
PC :
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to entertain a writ petition seeking quashing of an allotment order filed after a long delay.
Whether the grant of MPEG, PC, or any other specific section is applicable via Article 227.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Shiva Cable Vision
State of Maharashtra
MOHIT S. SHAH
S.J.KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
