Writ petition challenging Bombay Universities Act, 1994 section 64 was disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty to raise grounds later. Petitioner filed in person though representing the challenge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2226 OF 1994
Raju Z. Moray ..... ..... ...Appellant V/s University of Bombay & Ors. ... ... .... .......Respondents.
Mr.Raju Z. More Petitioner-in-person.
Mr.R.A.Rodriques, Adv. For reespondent No.1.
Mr.J.B.Shaluja, AGP for Respondent.
CORAM: J.N.PATEL ACTING C.J. AND B.R.GAVAI, J. 7th January, 2010.
PC:
The petitioner who is legal practitioner has challenged the validity of section 64 of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as “the said Act”). The petitioner has contended that section 64 which debars a legal practitioner from appearing on behalf of any party in any proceedings before the Tribunal is ultra vires of Article 19(1)(G) of the Constitution of India. Several other grounds are also raised challenging the validity of the said provison.
1
under section 64 of the said Act right from its inception learned Presiding Officers who have presided over the Tribunal are permitting the legal practitioners to appear with leave of the Tribunal. He therefore submits that as of now there is no necessity to decide the challenges raised in the petition. He further submits that in the event if legal practitioners are not permitted to appear before the learned Tribunal the petitioner may be permitted to raise grounds raised in the present petition.
(ACTING C.J.)
(B.R. GAVAI, J.)
2
Raju Z. Moray
University of Bombay
J.N.PATEL
B.R.GAVAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
