Writ petition involving a disputed question of facts regarding possession; petitioners requested to withdraw the petition and file a suit.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty prayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
OSWP+.2158
mss
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2158 OF 2009
SADANAND DAMODAR PATIL & ORS. .. PETITIONERS
Vs.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS..
.. RESPONDENTS
Mr. A. C. Singh i/b D. R. Shah for the petitioners Mr. D. A. Nalawde, GP
CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI &
R. V. MORE, JJ.
DATED : 27/9/2010
P.C.
Whereas the case of the petitioners is that the possession is with the petitioners, the case of the respondents is that the possession is taken over by them. In view of this stand of the petitioners and the respondents the question as regards possession because a disputed question of fact which this court cannot decide. The Counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners have instructed him to withdraw the petition and file a suit.
2
OSWP+.2158
mss
(SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.)
Sadanand Damodar Patil & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Ranjana Desai
R. V. More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
