The petition challenging the non-consideration of proposals for building redevelopment is dismissed as it is surrounded by a later communication rejecting the proposals.
Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIGINAL SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO.1980 OF 2009
D.D. Builders and Developers.... Petitioners
Vs.
The Maharashtra Housing &
Area Development Authority
& Ors..... Respondents
None for the Petitioners.
Shri G.W. Mattos, AGP, for the Respondents.
CORAM: J.N. PATEL AND
A.P. BHANGALE, JJ.
DATED: MARCH 22, 2010
P.C:
None for the petitioners. The learned
counsel appearing for the respondents states
that by the communication dated 20-1-2010 the
petitioners have been informed that their
proposals are rejected for the reasons given in
the communication. In view of this, the
grievance of the petitioners that their
proposals dated 16-6-2008 and 12-8-2009 for the
proposed re-development of the subject-building
is not being considered by the respondents does
not survive. Hence the petition is dismissed.
J.N. PATEL, J.
D.D. Builders and Developers
The Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority
J.N. PATEL
A.P. BHANGALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court