Petition challenging a tender cancellation was disposed of as having no substance following the Municipal Corporation's decision to cancel the tender due to a non-responsive single bid.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
１
srk
app-L-1875-10
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.1875 OF 2010
Bio-Tech International Ltd. and another. Versus
State of Maharashtra and others.
... Petitioners
... Respondents
Mr.J.J. Bhatt, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ankit Lohia, Ms. Henna Daulat and Mr. Shrivardhan Deshpande i/by M/s. Desai & Diwanji for the petitioners. Mr. M.D. Naik, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.1. Mr. E.P. Bharucha, Senior Advocate with Ms. Geeta Joglekar for respondent No.2
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
P .C.
The learned counsel for the respondent-Municipal Corporation states that since only one party applied in response to the tender notice for the item in question and that the said bid was otherwise also not responsive. the respondent-Corporation has taken a decision to cancel the Tender Notice for Aqueus suspension formulation containing 1200 ITU potency Bti 20 Ltr Plastic can
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Bio-Tech International Ltd.
State of Maharashtra
MOHIT S. SHAH
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
