The High Court at Aurangabad (Bombay Bench) disposed of three writ petitions by directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's pending representation in accordance with the law.
Direction to the respondents to consider the pending representation of the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1880 OF 2010 with WRIT PETITION NO. 1882 OF 2O10 with WRIT PETITION NO. 1885 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram or directions and Registrar's orders. appearances, Court's Orders
1
Mr. A.B. Kale, Advocate holding for Mr. P.C. Patil, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. S.K. Tambe, AGP for the respondents.
CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & R.M. BORDE, JJ.
PER COURT :-
1] The learned counsel for the petitioner restricts the claim in the petition only for a direction to the respondents to consider their representation, which is pending before them.
2] Writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioners, in accordance with law.
grt/-
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1880 OF 2010 with
WRIT PETITION NO. 1882 OF 2O10 with
WRIT PETITION NO. 1885 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram or directions and Registrar's orders. appearances, Court's Orders
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the respondents to consider the pending representation of the petitioner.
Petitioner
Respondents
B.R. GAVAI
R.M. BORDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
