Vilas Bharat Dhamne and Anr. Vs Hiravati Jairampant Lagad

The present Petitioners, who are the original Defendants, made an application for amendment of the Written Statement essentially for making a Counter claim for

¶15

2

¶16

possession. The application was made at a stage when an Affidavit in lieu of examination-in-chief was filed by the original Plaintiffs. By the impugned Order, the learned trial Judge has rejected the application made by the Petitioners. The Order is interlocutory in nature which is capable of being challenged in an Appeal which may be preferred against the decree passed in the suit, if the same be adverse to the Petitioners. The rejection of the application by impugned Order shall not prevent the Petitioners from filing a substantive suit for possession on the cause of action pleaded in the proposed Counter-claim.

¶17

Subject to what is observed above, no case is made out for interference in writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Writ Petition is rejected. All contentions of the parties are expressly kept open.

¶18

(A.S.OKA, J.)

Vilas Bharat Dhamne and Anr. v. Hiravati Jairampant Lagad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vilas Bharat Dhamne and Anr. v. Hiravati Jairampant Lagad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nalini Suresh Jadhav Vs Anandrao Mugutrao Jadhav and Ors.

Mt. J.K. Mamdyal Vs Allabaksh H. Maniyar and Anr.

Pundlik Tukaram Satam Vs Seema Narayan Satam and Anr.

Sudhakar Bhagwan Pusawale Vs Nishgandha Sudhakar Pusawale

Raghunath Khevaji Jambukar and Ors. Vs Pandurang Khevaji Jambukar and Anr.

Anwar Abdul Kadar Motiwala Vs Iqbal Ishaq Sharif