Criminal court disposed of a writ petition seeking modification of a furlough bond execution condition to allow it before a District Prison Superintendent instead of a Tahasildar.
Modified condition No. 3 of the order dated 6th March 2010 to allow execution of surety bond before Superintendent, District Prison, Satara, within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 crwp1398-10
agk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1398 OF 2010
Shivaji Kisan Gadgule ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent.
Smt.Indrayani M. Koparkar for the petitioner. Mr.A.S. Gadkari, APP for the State.
CORAM : A.M. Khanwilkar, & U.D. Salvi, JJ.
DATE : 3rd September 2010.
P.C. :
the surety bond before the Tahasildar at Patan, the petitioner’s wife can execute the same before the Superintendent, District Prison, Satara. The said formality can be complied within eight weeks from today.
crwp1398-10
2
Shivaji Kisan Gadgule
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. Khanwilkar
U.D. Salvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
