The High Court disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner upon representation of an alternative remedy. The court directed the respondents to maintain status quo for three weeks.
Status quo to be maintained by Respondent No.3 for three weeks from today.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
jmi
WRIT PETITION NO. 1296 OF 2010.
M.F. Munshi. ..Petitioner. v/s. The Chairman, Ambika Premises Co-operative Soc. Ltd. & Ors. ..Respondents.
Mr. Sunil Patel, i/b. M/s. Sunil & Co., for Petitioner. Mr. Milind More, AGP, for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 8TH JULY 2010.
P.C.
The learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner seeks to withdraw the Petition on the ground that he has an alternate remedy available under section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, which he shall pursue within a period of two weeks from today. He submits that Respondent no.3 be directed to maintain status-quo for a period of four weeks from today.
[ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ]
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.F. Munshi
The Chairman, Ambika Premises Co-operative Soc. Ltd.
Respondent No.3
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
