Petitioner withdrew writ petition seeking furlough. Court disposed of petition as withdrawn while expressly reserving opinion on petitioner's substantive right to furlough.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1wp-1167-10
L
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No.1167/2010
Office Notes, OfficeCourt�s or � |
� Judge�s orders |
|---|---|
Memoranda of Coram, |
|
appearances, Court�s |
|
orders or directions and |
|
Registrar�s orders. |
Mr Arfan Sait for the Petitioner.
Mrs A.S.Pai, A.P.P.,for the State.
CORAM:- D.B. BHOSALE AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE :- 3RD MAY, 2010.
P.C.:-
Counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this
writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh
application for furlough. Petition is disposed of as
withdrawn with liberty as prayed. While granting liberty,
we shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on
the rights of the petitioner to seek furlough. If he files
any such application same may be dealt with in accordance
with law.
L
State
D.B. BHOSALE
A.R. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court