Sanjay Sahdev Tupe and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and 9 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mgn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.64 OF 2009
Sanjay Sahdev Tupe & Anr.
...........Petitioners
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...........Respondents
Mr. S.M. Gorwadkar with Sona Yusuf Bangwala for the petitioners. Ms.Poornima Kalure i/b. J.G. Reddy, for respondent No.7. Ms. Geeta Jaglekar, for Respondent Nos. 5 and 6.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 22ND JULY, 2010
P.C.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners state that in view of the recommendation No.(2) of the Committee appointed for considering the security of the prisons in the State and as to at what distance from the prison wall the buildings around the existing prisons should be erected in future, etc., indicating that it will not be reasonable to impose restrictions on the development of the buildings either completed or under construction around the existing prisons which have obtained sanction as per the Development Control Rules, the apprehension entertained by the petitioners earlier does not survive. Learned Counsel, therefore, does not press this petition. Petition is accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs.
CHIEF JUSTICE
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J
Sanjay Sahdev Tupe
The State of Maharashtra
Mohan Shah
Dharmadhikari
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court