Dismissed
Jitendra Narayanrao Ghosekar v. the State of Maha. Thr Secretary, Mumbai and Others
Bombay HCPIL/26/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.26 OF 2010
(JITENDRA NARAYANRAO GHOSEKAR..VS.. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTH.)
CORAM : V.C.DAGA & A.B.CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 13, 2010.
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no instructions to proceed with the matter.
The petition is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs.
JUDGE
JUDGE
RR..
Jitendra Narayanrao Ghosekar
State of Maharashtra
V.C.Daga
A.B.Chaudhari
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court