Civil PIL No. 189 of 2010 was dismissed as withdrawn at the request of counsel upon receipt of a letter from the Chief Commercial Manager, Central Railway.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 pil 189.10.doc11
srk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 189 OF 2010
Baban Vithal Mande ... Petitioner Vs. The Union of India & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. Ramdas P. Sabban for the Petitioner. Mr. S.R.Nargolkar, AGP for Respondent no.5.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATE : 16 September, 2010.
P. C.
Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner seeks leave of the court to withdraw the Petition in view of the letter dated 9 September, 2010 from the Chief Commercial Manager, Central Railway, C.S.T., Mumbai. On the request of the counsel, the Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J.
Baban Vithal Mande
The Union of India & Ors.
DR. D.Y. Chandrachud
R.P. Sondurbaldota
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
