The High Court dismissed the PIL dated 07/05/2024 under PIL Nos. 116/2007 for default due to the non-appearance of the petitioners or their counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL116.09
AJN
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.116 OF 2007
Avinash Ganpatrao Chavan & Anr. ... Petitioners
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents
None for the petitioners.
Mr. V.P. Malvankar, Government Pleader for respondents 1 and 2.
Mr. Uday Warunjikar for respondent 3.
CORAM: MRS. RANJANA DESAI & R.V. MORE, JJ.
DATED : 1ST SEPTEMBER, 2010.
P.C.:-
We notice that on 31/1/2008 the petitioner’s counsel was not present. Today, again neither the petitioner nor his counsel is present. Hence, the petition is dismissed for default.
[MRS. RANJANA DESAI, J.]
[R.V. MORE, J.]
Avinash Ganpatrao Chavan & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Ranjana Desai
R.V. More
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
