Dismissed
Mumbai Taxi Association v. State of Maharashtra and 5 Ors.
Bombay HCNMW/546/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI ORDINARY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
mgn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.546 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1153 OF 2009
Mumbai Taxi Association. ..Petitioners Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. P.M. Havnur, for the Petitioners. Ms. Rachitta Rai i/b. Udwadia & Udeshi for respondent No.3 and 4. Mr. G.S. Godbole with Mr. Nitin Muley, for respondent No.5. Mr. A.B. Gupta i/b. Vyas & Balwal, for respondent No.6.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 16TH FEBRUARY, 2010
P.C.
Petition has been disposed off. Really speaking this Motion would not be maintainable. Even otherwise on 3rd December, 2009 the State Government has taken a policy decision. In the light of that Motion dismissed. If the petitioner is aggrieved by any other directions they can independently contest the same.
(J.H. BHATIA,J.)
(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
Mumbai Taxi Association
State of Maharashtra
F.I. REBELLO
J.H. BHATIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court