A single-paragraph order permitting service of notice on the original petitioner by publication or otherwise due to refusal of personal service, while disposing of the notice of motion in writ petition no. 1076 of 2010.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NMW.443.2010
1
mst
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTIONN NO.443 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1076 OF 2010
Mohammedali Chottu Sheikh
Applicant
versus
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Respondent
Ms.Geeta Jogalekar, adv. for MCGB (Org.respondent) None for respondents (Org.Petitioners).
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. AND DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATE : 29th September 2010
P. C. :
NMW.443.2010
2
mst
states that the Municipal Corporation will also recover the security charges from the petitioner. If the Municipal Corporation has power to recover such charges, the Corporation will do that in accordance with law.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
Mohammedali Chottu Sheikh
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Mohit S. Shah
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
