This order grants condonation of delay in filing a Notice of Motion to set aside a default dismissal. The petitioner succeeds in getting the notice filed.
Condonation of 17 days delay in filing Notice of Motion No. 2213 of 2005.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
jmi
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 885 OF 2006 IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2213 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO. 246 OF 1977.
Nalini Ramakant Jadhav. ..Plaintiff.
vs.
Manorama Widow of Madhavrao Jagtap & Ors. ..Defendants.
Ms. B.P. Jhakadi, for Plaintiff. Mr. Uday M. Jagtap, Defendant No.2, present in person.
CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 7TH DECEMBER 2010.
P.C.
By this Notice of Motion, the Plaintiff has prayed for condonation of delay of 17 days in filing Notice of Motion No. 2213 of 2005 in Suit No. 246 of 1977. The Notice of Motion No. 2213 of 2005 is taken out for setting aside the order dated 9th June 2005 dismissing the Suit No. 246 of 1977 for default.
no objection if the delay is condoned.
2
Motion is condoned. The Notice of Motion No. 885 of 2006 is accordingly, disposed of.
and 4 at the address provided by the Defendant No.2.
Nalini Ramakant Jadhav
Manorama Widow of Madhavrao Jagtap
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
