Petition filed to appoint a guardian for a minor respondent in an underlying suit for recovery of possession. The court made the petition absolute and appointed the father as the guardian.
The petition is made absolute and the father of Nitin Jhota is appointed as the guardian.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MP-9
1
PGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Miscellaneous Petition No.9 of 2010
IN
Suit (Lg) No. 231 of 2010
Deepak Narendrakumar Jhota & anr....Petitioners
v/s.
Nitin Narendrakumar Jhota & anr.
...Respondents
Mr.Sushant Anaokar i/by Mr.A.M. Vernekar for the
Petitioners.
CORAM : SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J.
DATED :2nd September, 2010
P.C. :
1.The Petitioners have sued the minor one Nitin Jhota as well as his parents and other family members in a suit for recovery of possession. Guardian of the minor, who is Defendant No.5 in the suit, has to be appointed. His parents are Defendants. Hence, they would be appointed the guardians to protect his interest. The Petition is served upon the parents.2.The Petition is made absolute in terms of prayer (a). The father of the child is appointed guardian to act in2
MP-9
the interest of child in the suit.
3.The Petition is disposed of accordingly.( SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J.)
Deepak Narendrakumar Jhota
Nitin Narendrakumar Jhota
Roshan Dalvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court