The High Court allowed the appeal on settlement terms agreed by parties regarding maintenance post-divorce, directing fresh decree and investment of deposited amount as per consent.
Appeal allowed per settlement consent terms; fresh decree directed; deposited rupees ten lakhs reserved in fixed deposit until further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
fca-55-10
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 55 OF 2010 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 93 OF 2010
Aruna Nabh Vs.
Raj Kanwal Nabh
.. Petitioner
.. Respondent
Ms. Sumangala for appellant. Ms. Amarjit Kaur for respondent.
CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U. D. SALVI, JJ.
DECEMBER 21, 2010.
P.C.
settlement between the parties and reduced in writing in the form of “Consent Terms”. The settlement has been signed by both the parties on 25/10/2010 and so as to comply with the terms of the said settlement, the respondent was granted some time, and today the documents placed before us indicate that a Demand Draft in the sum of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs only) drawn in favour of the Registrar, Appellate Side, High Court, Bombay has been deposited on 14/12/2010.
2
fca-55-10
by consent and the grievance in this appeal was limited to the issue of maintenance and the same has been settled.
(U.D. SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)
3
fca-55-10
Aruna Nabh
Raj Kanwal Nabh
B. H. Marlappalle
U. D. Salvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
