First appeal by Comune de Balli was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant was absent and no advocate was present on the day of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
FIRST APPEAL NO. 255 OF 2005
COMMUNIDADE DE PROVINCIA DE BALLI, QUEPEM GOA. ... Appellant Versus SHRI RAM DOLO VELIP, QUEPEM GOA. ... Respondent
Ms. Prashila P. Naik, Advocate for the Appellant - absent.
Coram:N. A. BRITTO, J.
Date:21st December, 2010
P.C.:
None present for the appellant today, again. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
N. A. BRITTO, J.
NH
COMMUNIDADE DE PROVINCIA DE BALLI, QUEPEM GOA
SHRI RAM DOLO VELIP, QUEPEM GOA
N. A. BRITTO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
