no.77 is on the north is village Tiloi and, therefore, the said property Paniatil chactam goes up to the boundary limit of village Cordem and Tiloi. In fact, the learned Reference Court has observed and, in my view rightly, that attorney of party no.5, the appellant herein, is not at all aware of the relevant facts as regards the boundaries, area and other details of the property “Paniatil chactam” and that his cross-examination disclosed that he did not know the contents of the deed of partition by which the said property was allotted, etc. In fact, the attorney of party no.5 stated that he was unable to give the boundaries which fall in Survey No.41/3 as well as which fall in Survey No.30/1. He also stated that he did not know any property known as “Ponsa sheta” of Colaco. He also conceded that Survey No.41/3 was recorded in the names of party no.1,2 & 3 in the occupants column and the name of party no.6 was shown in the tenants column along with his brother and he came to know about the said record about 10 to 12 years back but failed to explain as to what action party no.5 had taken regarding correction of survey records. According to him, boundaries of Survey No.30/1 is the national highway on the east, property Balasorem on the west, property Sal on the north and property of one muslim family on the south. This means that the property surveyed under no.30/1 does not even touch the acquired
